Strict unemployment stands at 10.8% for the first quarter of 2026. But the indicator the HCP now foregrounds — 22.5% labour under-utilisation — tells a different story, and it is the one that matters to employers.
- Why the HCP changed its measure
- What the breakdown by age, sex and area reveals
- The silent shortage: senior leadership
- Three responses that work
- What to stop doing
Why the HCP changed its measure
With the new labour-force survey (EMO2026) the HCP tightened its definition of unemployment: a person counts as unemployed if they are without work, available to work and actively seeking it. The result is a strict rate of 10.8%.
Alongside it, the HCP publishes a composite labour under-utilisation rate of 22.5%. That gap is what matters to a recruiter. It captures people in underemployment, discouraged workers, and those available but not actively searching — a labour reserve that does not show up in the unemployment figure yet exists in the market.
What this changes in practice. An employer reading “10.8% unemployment” concludes the market is tight. An employer reading “22.5% under-utilisation” understands there is a substantial pool that will not turn up in response to a job advert. The consequence is methodological: you have to go and find people, not wait for them.
What the breakdown reveals
Three gaps stand out. The 15-24 age group at 29.2% — close to one young active person in three. Women at 16.1% against 9.4% for men, a gap of nearly seven points which, for an employer, signals an under-used pool rather than a supply problem. And urban at 13.5% against 6.1% rural, which reflects the nature of agricultural and informal work more than an abundance of rural jobs.
For an HR function in Casablanca the useful reading is this: the urban basin concentrates both the pressure on employment and the skills mismatch. That is where employer brand makes the difference, because qualified candidates there have options.
The silent shortage: senior leadership
There is a mismatch that is rarely quantified: Morocco is not short of graduates, it is short of leaders able to convert industrial projects and governance reforms into sustained execution. That is not a volume problem but a bench-depth problem.
The cause is structural. A generation of managers was promoted on technical performance without passing through any leadership-development instrument. They hold executive roles with the reflexes of an excellent specialist — which works right up to the moment two directorates both have a legitimate case and someone has to choose.
The two levers that genuinely address this are executive coaching and succession planning. The first works on posture; the second organises the bench before it becomes urgent.
Key takeaways
- Strict unemployment: 10.8% (Q1 2026). Composite under-utilisation: 22.5% — the second figure describes your market.
- 15-24 age group: 29.2%. Women: 16.1% against 9.4% for men.
- The pool exists but will not come to you: active sourcing is required.
- The leadership shortage is about bench depth, not graduate volume.
- The answers: active sourcing, employer brand, coaching and succession planning.
Three responses that work
- Source instead of advertising. If 22.5% of the workforce is under-used but not actively searching, a job advert does not reach them. Direct approach becomes the norm, not something reserved for executive roles.
- Hire for potential, train for the gap. Against a general skills mismatch, waiting for the perfect profile amounts to not hiring. Assessing potential and then funding the upskilling — including through the GIAC and OFPPT schemes — is faster and cheaper.
- Build the bench before you need it. A succession plan is prepared two years before a departure, not two months after the announcement.
What to stop doing
Two reflexes are expensive. Lengthening the requirements list when a search drags on: that shrinks the pool further without improving candidate quality. And treating retention as a pay question: in a market where qualified candidates have options, they leave for management and prospects, and a salary counter-offer only buys time.
Secure your key positions
Direct approach, potential assessment, succession planning: we work where a casting error costs the most.



Recent Posts
Morocco’s 2026 Labour Code Reform: What Changes for Employers
Morocco’s 2026 Minimum Wage: Payroll Cost Breakdown for Employers
AI in Recruitment 2026: What Actually Works (and the Legal Risks)
Skills-Based Hiring: Replacing the CV with Evidence
Catégories